Friday, January 11, 2013

Notes from January 7 language meeting

Dart engineer Bob Nystrom has posted the notes from the January 7th language design meeting. He writes:

Here's my notes from this week's meeting:

call() versus operator()

Gilad brought up the perennial discussion of how classes that emulate functions should define that operation: as a method named call() or using an operator syntax.

Lars: What are problems with making it an operator?
Gilad: At this point I think we could. It's an incompatible change, but not a big deal.

Configuration-specific code

Gilad has a rough proposal he's working on for this.

Method cascade grammar

[Bob: I think the Dart implementations and spec are out of sync regarding how they handle precedence of method cascades in particular with respect to the ternary operator.]

Gilad: The grammar for cascades makes sense from perspective of someone looking at the grammar, but not as much for someone trying to program using them.

Kasper: There are a couple of corners of the grammar that are confusing and there have been bugs filed. Maybe we should take a look at moving some things around.

Lazy loading libraries

Lars: Something to move up on the list is lazy loading. Aarhus has started working on this.

Kasper: Should be able to compile into multiple specific files that are loaded somehow on demand and can be stitched together.

Gilad: This and configuration-specific code are somehow related.

Cheers!

As always, we invite you to join our Dart mailing list, ask questions on Stack Overflow, or file feature requests on dartbug.com.